The Perils of Indifference
Holocaust survivor
and Nobel Laureate, Elie Wiesel,
gave this impassioned speech in the East Room of the White House on April
12, 1999, as part of the Millennium Lecture series, hosted by President Bill
Clinton and First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Mr. President,
Mrs. Clinton, members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke,
Excellencies, friends: Fifty-four years ago to the day, a young Jewish boy
from a small town in the Carpathian Mountains woke up, not far from Goethe's
beloved
Liberated
a day earlier by American soldiers, he remembers their rage at what they saw.
And even if he lives to be a very old man, he will always be grateful to them
for that rage, and also for their compassion. Though he did not understand
their language, their eyes told him
what he needed to know -- that they, too, would remember, and bear witness.
And now, I stand
before you, Mr. President -- Commander-in-Chief of the army that freed me,
and tens of thousands of others -- and I am filled with a profound and abiding
gratitude to the American people.
Gratitude is a word
that I cherish. Gratitude is what defines the humanity of the human being.
And I am grateful to you, Hillary -- or Mrs. Clinton -- for what you said,
and for what you are doing for children in the world, for the homeless, for
the victims of injustice, the victims of destiny and society. And I thank
all of you for being here.
We are on the threshold
of a new century, a new millennium. What will the legacy of this vanishing
century be? How will it be remembered in the new millennium? Surely it will
be judged, and judged severely, in both moral and metaphysical terms. These
failures have cast a dark shadow over humanity: two World Wars, countless
civil wars, the senseless chain of assassinations -- Gandhi, the Kennedys,
Martin Luther King, Sadat, Rabin -- bloodbaths in
Cambodia and Nigeria, India and Pakistan, Ireland and Rwanda, Eritrea and
Ethiopia, Sarajevo and Kosovo; the inhumanity in the gulag and the tragedy
of Hiroshima. And, on a different level, of course,
What is indifference?
Etymologically, the word means "no difference." A strange and unnatural
state in which the lines blur between light and darkness, dusk and dawn, crime
and punishment, cruelty and compassion, good and evil.
What are its courses
and inescapable consequences? Is it a philosophy? Is there a philosophy of
indifference conceivable? Can one possibly view indifference as a virtue?
Is it necessary at times to practice it simply to keep one's sanity, live
normally, enjoy a fine meal and a glass of wine, as the world around us experiences
harrowing upheavals?
Of course, indifference
can be tempting -- more than that, seductive. It is so much easier to look
away from victims. It is so much easier to avoid such rude interruptions to
our work, our dreams, our hopes. It is, after all,
awkward, troublesome, to be involved in another person's pain and despair.
Yet, for the person who is indifferent, his or her neighbor
are of no consequence. And, therefore, their lives are meaningless.
Their hidden or even visible anguish is of no interest. Indifference reduces
the other to an abstraction.
Over there, behind
the black gates of
Rooted in our tradition,
some of us felt that to be abandoned by humanity then was not the ultimate.
We felt that to be abandoned by God was worse than to be punished by Him.
Better an unjust God than an indifferent one. For us to be ignored by God
was a harsher punishment than to be a victim of His anger. Man can live far
from God -- not outside God. God is wherever we are. Even in suffering? Even
in suffering.
In a way, to be indifferent
to that suffering is what makes the human being inhuman. Indifference, after
all, is more dangerous than anger and hatred. Anger can at times be creative.
One writes a great poem, a great symphony, one does something special for
the sake of humanity because one is angry at the injustice that one witnesses.
But indifference is never creative. Even hatred at times may elicit a response.
You fight it. You denounce it. You disarm it. Indifference elicits no response.
Indifference is not a response.
Indifference is not
a beginning, it is an end. And, therefore, indifference is always the friend
of the enemy, for it benefits the aggressor -- never his victim, whose pain
is magnified when he or she feels forgotten. The political prisoner in his
cell, the hungry children, the homeless refugees -- not to respond to their
plight, not to relieve their solitude by offering them a spark of hope is
to exile them from human memory. And in denying their humanity we betray our
own.
Indifference, then,
is not only a sin, it is a punishment. And this is one of the most important
lessons of this outgoing century's wide-ranging experiments in good and evil.
In the place that
I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killers,
the victims, and the bystanders. During the darkest of times, inside the ghettoes
and death camps -- and I'm glad that Mrs. Clinton mentioned that we are now
commemorating that event, that period, that we are now in the Days of Remembrance
-- but then, we felt abandoned, forgotten. All of us did.
And our only miserable
consolation was that we believed that Auschwitz and Treblinka were closely
guarded secrets; that the leaders of the free world did not know what was
going on behind those black gates and barbed wire; that they had no knowledge
of the war against the Jews that Hitler's armies and their accomplices waged
as part of the war against the Allies.
If they knew, we
thought, surely those leaders would have moved heaven and earth to intervene.
They would have spoken out with great outrage and conviction. They would have
bombed the railways leading to Birkenau, just the
railways, just once.
And now we knew,
we learned, we discovered that the Pentagon knew, the State Department knew.
And the illustrious occupant of the White House then, who was a great leader
-- and I say it with some anguish and pain, because, today is exactly 54 years
marking his death -- Franklin Delano Roosevelt died on April the 12th, 1945,
so he is very much present to me and to us.
No doubt, he was
a great leader. He mobilized the American people and the world, going into
battle, bringing hundreds and thousands of valiant and brave soldiers in
The depressing tale
of the
I don't understand.
But then, there were
human beings who were sensitive to our tragedy. Those non-Jews, those Christians,
that we called the "Righteous Gentiles," whose selfless acts of
heroism saved the honor of their faith. Why were they so few? Why was there
a greater effort to save SS murderers after the war than to save their victims
during the war?
Why did some of
And yet, my friends,
good things have also happened in this traumatic century: the defeat of Nazism,
the collapse of communism, the rebirth of
And then, of course,
the joint decision of the
Does it mean that
we have learned from the past? Does it mean that society has changed? Has
the human being become less indifferent and more human? Have we really learned
from our experiences? Are we less insensitive to the plight of victims of
ethnic cleansing and other forms of injustices in places near and far? Is
today's justified intervention in Kosovo, led by you, Mr. President, a lasting
warning that never again will the deportation, the terrorization of children
and their parents be allowed anywhere in the world? Will it discourage other
dictators in other lands to do the same?
What about the children?
Oh, we see them on television, we read about them in the papers, and we do
so with a broken heart. Their fate is always the most tragic, inevitably.
When adults wage war, children perish. We see their faces, their eyes. Do
we hear their pleas? Do we feel their pain, their agony? Every minute one
of them dies of disease, violence, famine. Some of them -- so many of them
-- could be saved.
And so, once again,
I think of the young Jewish boy from the
Elie Wiesel - April 12,
1999